Analysis:
When Nietzsche stated, "God is dead." he was making a cultural statement. The claim was that God has died in the popular imagination. It is not believable for there to be a God. In the opening sentence it states, "...that madman who lit a lantern in the bright morning hours,..." now, there is no need for a light in bright morning hours except for the fact that 1. he is mad and 2. the people are in the dark. The madman is laughed and jeered at by the crowd as he calls out in search of God. This shows the apparent attitude of the crowd toward God. The madman angered by the crowd, speaks out, "Whither is God?" he cried; "I will tell you. We have killed him -- you and I. All of us are his murderers." In this, Nietzsche is pointing out that in the last couple years we have killed God from society with the rise of reason and science. That the death of God in society is our doing.

The Parable continues, "I have come too early," he said then; "my time is not yet." At the end of the 18th Century, when this was written, society did not understand the consequences of their actions. They did not understand that reason without God has no rules. That reason without God does not solve our problems. That reason without God only gives us better ways to kill each other. As society had killed all thought of God, the madman found no hope in God.
[[The full work by Nietzsche is available here: http://www.fordham.edu/halsall/mod/nietzsche-madman.asp]]
*My notes are from a lecture series by Summit Ministries. http://www.summit.org/about/
With Love<3
Very powerful and creative imagery. Thanks for sharing.
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
DeleteDon't forget the part where he says we should make ourselves gods to be worthy of the murder of god. The idea of the overman, self overcoming and redefining morality in human terms is a main theme in his work. The madman is not mourning, but a lesson that as god is dead we should now be aware we are entirely responsible for our actions and his perception that late 19th century intellectuals had not yet given this serious thought
ReplyDelete